Try this. Stand on one leg and hop. Land on the other leg and hop again. Now keep going for 40 minutes. That’s a run.
We usually think of running as an endurance sport, all heart and lungs. Those matter a lot. But what actually moves you forward is your foot pushing into the ground, thousands of times, for a fraction of a second each time. One classic study compared a runner to “a rubber ball bouncing along.”1
Coach and ultrarunner David Roche has been making this point for years on his podcast, Some Work, All Play. “I think that fast strides are the most powerful training stimulus for runners,” he wrote. We wanted to see how well the research backs that up. Here’s what we found, including where it falls short.
The short version
- Speed comes from pushing harder. Fast runners push into the ground harder. They don’t move their legs through the air any faster.
- Sprints can make your usual pace easier. In several studies, trained runners who added short sprints used less energy at the same pace and ran faster, even while running less.
- Hard workouts don’t need to be long. Across 69 studies, interval sessions of about 11 minutes, rests included, gave 80% of the fitness gain. That’s around 5 minutes of actual hard running.
- Easy running still does most of the work. The fast stuff works best as a small addition, not a replacement.
What does power mean in running?
Power is how hard you can push, and how quickly. Running gives you very little time to do it. In one study, athletes running at top speed had each foot on the ground for about a tenth of a second. In that moment, they pushed down with an average of 2.08 times their body weight, peaking at 3.62.2
A lot of force, in about a tenth of a second
How hard one foot pushes into the ground at top speed, in multiples of body weight.
| Time on the ground | 0.108 s |
|---|---|
| Average force | 2.08 × body weight |
| Peak force | 3.62 × body weight |
Data: Weyand et al., 2010.
The same lab tested 33 people with top speeds from 6.2 to 11.1 meters per second, roughly 4:20 down to 2:25 per mile. The fastest people didn’t swing their legs through any quicker. They pushed into the ground harder.3
Ground force
1.26×
More force from the fastest runner (11.1 m/s) than the slowest (6.2 m/s)
Leg swing
No change
Moving the leg through the air took the same time at every speed
Why should distance runners care?
Nobody sprints at mile 19. But two things carry over.
A higher top speed makes race pace feel easier, because race pace becomes a smaller share of what your legs can do. In elite 800 m runners, sprint speed was strongly linked to race times.4 In well-trained 5K runners, faster 5Ks went along with faster sprints and less time on the ground with each step.5
It can also make you more efficient. Running economy is how much energy it takes to hold a given pace. The less you need, the easier that pace feels. Roche has a good way of picturing it:
“Instead of forcing the bus to go fast, I’d rather upgrade to a Porsche.”
David Roche, in a 2017 interview with Andrew Skurka
A Finnish study from 1999 shows how this works. For nine weeks, well-trained runners kept their total training the same, but one group swapped about a third of it for explosive strength work. That group ran faster 5Ks and used less energy at the same pace, without any change in VO2max. The other group raised their VO2max, but their 5K didn’t get any faster.6
Do sprints really help distance runners?
This is the study Roche has called his all-time favorite. Danish researchers had 20 trained runners do 10 sprint sessions over 40 days, mostly 10 × 30 seconds all-out with 3.5 minutes of walking in between. Meanwhile, they cut their weekly running by 36%, from 25 to 16 km. Afterwards, the runners used about 2% less energy both at 10K pace and at an easy pace, and they ran their 10K 3.2% faster, from 45.2 down to 43.7 minutes. VO2max didn’t change.7
Other studies found something similar. Here they are, from the smallest cut in training to the biggest.
Less running plus some sprinting: what happened
Studies where trained runners added sprints or near-sprints while running less.
| Study | Training cut | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| Bangsbo, 20096–9 weeks · 12 runners | 25% | 10K about 1 minute faster37.3 to 36.3 min. 3K faster too. VO2max unchanged. |
| Skovgaard, 201840 days · 20 runners | 36% | 10K 3.2% fasterAbout 2% less energy at the same pace. VO2max unchanged. |
| Gunnarsson, 20127 weeks · 10 runners | 54% | 5K 48 seconds faster1,500 m 21 seconds faster. VO2max up 4%. |
| Vorup, 20168 weeks · 9 runners, with lifting | 58% | 10K no faster400 m 5% faster. Energy use and VO2max unchanged. |
| Iaia, 20094 weeks · 9 runners | 65% | 10K no faster5.7–7.6% less energy at the same pace. VO2max unchanged. |
Data: Bangsbo 2009, Skovgaard 2018, Gunnarsson 2012, Vorup 2016, Iaia 2009.
Look at the last two rows. When training was cut by more than half, 10K times held steady instead of improving. Sprints don’t replace regular running. They work best as a short block on top of it.891011 Even six sessions over two weeks made trained trail runners about 6% faster over 3K, though that study had no comparison group.12
A 2025 review of this kind of training came to the same conclusion, and added that you don’t need much of it: twice a week worked as well as four times.13
What about strides, hills and weights?
Strides, about 20 seconds of fast but relaxed running, are a gentler version of these sprints. We couldn’t find a good study of strides on their own, so the case for them comes from the sprint research plus a lot of coaching experience. They take five minutes and carry little risk. Roche’s advice: “Going faster than you’ll ever race–but not as fast as you absolutely can–will make you faster overall at all effort levels.”20
Hills and the gym help too. Six weeks of hard uphill intervals made well-trained runners about 2% faster over 5K.14 Eight weeks of heavy squats cut the energy they needed at the same pace by 5%.15 Jumping drills helped in some studies,16 but heavy lifting seems to help more.17 Across 24 strength-training studies, runners typically needed 2–8% less energy at the same pace, though not in every study.18
Different ways to use less energy at the same pace
How much less energy runners needed at the same pace after each kind of training.
| 30-second sprintsIaia 2009 · 4 weeks | 5.7–7.6% | |
| Heavy squatsStøren 2008 · 8 weeks | 5.0% | |
| Jumping drillsSaunders 2006 · fast pace only | 4.1% | |
| Hard hill intervalsBarnes 2013 · 6 weeks | 2.4% | |
| 30-second sprintsSkovgaard 2018 · at 10K pace | 2.1% | |
| Sprints plus liftingVorup 2016 · 8 weeks | None |
Data: Iaia 2009, Støren 2008, Saunders 2006, Barnes 2013, Skovgaard 2018, Vorup 2016.
How much hard running do you need?
Less than you’d think. A 2026 review of 69 studies looked at how long interval sessions need to be to improve VO2max, a common measure of fitness. Most of the benefit came early. Interval sessions of about 11 minutes, rests included, got 80% of the biggest gain. That’s only around 5 minutes of actual hard running. Steady, moderate running needed about 52 minutes to get there.19 The Roches covered it in an episode called, in part, “Why You May Not Need Much Intensity.”
The first few minutes do most of the work
Each line shows a share of that kind of training’s biggest VO2max gain, by session length including rests. Move across the chart to explore.
| Training | Session length for 80% of the gain, in minutes with rests | Likely range |
|---|---|---|
| Hard intervals | About 11 | 9.5–40.2 |
| Steady, moderate running | About 52 | 30.4–55.8 |
Data: Mattioni Maturana et al., 2026.
The likely range is wide, from 9.5 to 40 minutes, so 11 isn’t a magic number. And VO2max isn’t the same thing as your race time. But the takeaway holds: after the first few minutes of hard work, each extra minute adds less. Other researchers have suggested that 5 to 7 minutes near your maximum effort per session may be enough for team-sport athletes, while trained endurance athletes may need more than 10, though that isn’t proven.21
For most people, five-ish minutes of real effort is a proper workout, and the amount can grow as you get fitter. That’s how we approach speed sessions in Strides plans.
Should your reps be short or long?
Both, because they do different jobs. A 2026 review of 102 studies found that in an all-out effort, your body switches from mostly anaerobic to mostly aerobic energy at about 78.6 seconds.22
After about 80 seconds, most of the energy is aerobic
Where the energy comes from during one all-out effort.
| All-out effort | Anaerobic | Aerobic |
|---|---|---|
| 10 s | 91% | 9% |
| 20 s | 82% | 18% |
| 30 s | 75% | 25% |
| 60 s | 58% | 42% |
| 120 s | 38% | 62% |
| 240 s | 22% | 78% |
| 600 s | 11% | 89% |
Data: Gastin & Suppiah, 2026.
So a 20-second stride mostly trains your muscles and nerves to move fast, while a 4-minute rep mostly trains your heart and lungs. In one study, 4 × 4 minutes hard raised VO2max by 7.2% in eight weeks.23 Short reps build speed, long reps build your aerobic fitness, and easy running supports both.
What should I actually do?
Start small. Here are four options, from easiest to hardest. The last two are based on what the studies used, so treat them as ideas rather than rules.
Start here
Strides
4–8 × 20 seconds, walk or jog 1–2 minutes
After an easy run, once or twice a week. Fast, tall and relaxed, never straining.
Anyone who can run comfortably
Add some power
Short hills
6 × 20 seconds uphill, walk back down
Hard but smooth, with strong steps rather than quick, choppy ones. The hill makes you push and keeps your stride short.
After a few weeks of strides
Go lift
Heavy squats
4 sets of 4, with full rest
The study did this three times a week for eight weeks, alongside normal running. Add weight slowly, and get your form checked if you’re new to lifting.
Anyone, with good coaching
The big one
A sprint block
6–10 × 30 seconds hard, walk 3.5 minutes
Twice in eight days for about six weeks, as in the 2018 study. Warm up well, ease into the first rep, and stop the block when the six weeks are up.
Experienced, healthy runners only
Go easy on all-out sprints. The runners in these studies were trained and supervised.13 If you haven’t run fast in a while, start with strides. As the Roches said on another episode, you should rarely be pushing as hard as you possibly can.
What are the limits of this research?
The studies are small. Most had between 9 and 20 runners doing the training, so one or two big responders can sway the results.
They’re short. Most lasted two to nine weeks. Nobody has shown this keeps working for years.
The runners were already fit, and mostly young men. Results may differ for new runners or older runners.
Not every study agrees. Two of the five in our table saw no faster 10K. We kept them in for a reason.
Our take: keep most of your running easy. Once or twice a week, add a few minutes of fast running. It doesn’t take much, and it can make every pace feel easier.
Common questions
Is running a power sport?
Partly. You need good aerobic fitness, but every step is a short, hard push into the ground. At top speed your foot is down for about a tenth of a second while pushing with up to about 3.6 times your body weight, and faster runners get there by pushing harder, not by moving their legs faster.
Do sprints help distance runners?
Often, for trained runners. In a 2018 study, 10 sessions of 30-second sprints over 40 days helped runners use about 2% less energy at the same pace and run a 10K 3.2% faster, even though they ran 36% less. Not every study agrees, so treat sprints as a short block on top of normal running.
How long should a hard interval workout be?
Shorter than most people think. A 2026 review of 69 studies found that interval sessions of about 11 minutes, rests included, gave 80% of the maximum gain in VO2max. That’s only around 5 minutes of actual hard running. The likely range was wide, from 9.5 to 40 minutes, but after that point each extra minute adds less.
Are strides worth doing?
Yes, for most runners. Strides haven’t been studied much on their own, so the case for them comes from research on harder sprints plus coaching experience. They take about five minutes after an easy run and carry little risk.
Sources
- 1Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RM. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature, 1987. doi:10.1038/325147a0
- 2Weyand PG, Sandell RF, Prime DN, Bundle MW. The biological limits to running speed are imposed from the ground up. J Appl Physiol, 2010. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00947.2009
- 3Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, Wright S. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol, 2000. doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1991
- 4Sandford GN, Allen SV, Kilding AE, Ross A, Laursen PB. Anaerobic speed reserve: a key component of elite male 800-m running. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2019. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0163
- 5Paavolainen LM, Nummela AT, Rusko HK. Neuromuscular characteristics and muscle power as determinants of 5-km running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1999. doi:10.1097/00005768-199901000-00020
- 6Paavolainen L, Häkkinen K, Hämäläinen I, Nummela A, Rusko H. Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power. J Appl Physiol, 1999. doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1527
- 7Skovgaard C, Christiansen D, Christensen PM, Almquist NW, Thomassen M, Bangsbo J. Effect of speed endurance training and reduced training volume on running economy and single muscle fiber adaptations in trained runners. Physiol Rep, 2018. doi:10.14814/phy2.13601
- 8Bangsbo J, Gunnarsson TP, Wendell J, Nybo L, Thomassen M. Reduced volume and increased training intensity elevate muscle Na+-K+ pump α2-subunit expression as well as short- and long-term work capacity in humans. J Appl Physiol, 2009. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00358.2009
- 9Gunnarsson TP, Bangsbo J. The 10-20-30 training concept improves performance and health profile in moderately trained runners. J Appl Physiol, 2012. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2012
- 10Vorup J, Tybirk J, Gunnarsson TP, Ravnholt T, Dalsgaard S, Bangsbo J. Effect of speed endurance and strength training on performance, running economy and muscular adaptations in endurance-trained runners. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00421-016-3356-4
- 11Iaia FM, Hellsten Y, Nielsen JJ, Fernström M, Sahlin K, Bangsbo J. Four weeks of speed endurance training reduces energy expenditure during exercise and maintains muscle oxidative capacity despite a reduction in training volume. J Appl Physiol, 2009. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90676.2008
- 12Koral J, Oranchuk DJ, Herrera R, Millet GY. Six sessions of sprint interval training improves running performance in trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2018. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002286
- 13Bangsbo J, Kissow J, Hostrup M. Speed endurance training to improve performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2025. doi:10.1111/sms.70091
- 14Barnes KR, Hopkins WG, McGuigan MR, Kilding AE. Effects of different uphill interval-training programs on running economy and performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2013. doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.6.639
- 15Støren O, Helgerud J, Støa EM, Hoff J. Maximal strength training improves running economy in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2008. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318168da2f
- 16Saunders PU, Telford RD, Pyne DB, et al. Short-term plyometric training improves running economy in highly trained middle and long distance runners. J Strength Cond Res, 2006. doi:10.1519/R-18235.1
- 17Eihara Y, Takao K, Sugiyama T, et al. Heavy resistance training versus plyometric training for improving running economy and running time trial performance. Sports Med Open, 2022. doi:10.1186/s40798-022-00511-1
- 18Blagrove RC, Howatson G, Hayes PR. Effects of strength training on the physiological determinants of middle- and long-distance running performance: a systematic review. Sports Med, 2018. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0835-7
- 19Mattioni Maturana F, Zadon NHA, Cocks M, Nieß AM, Thijssen DHJ, Dawson EA. Optimising exercise prescription: a meta-analysis examining the dose response of exercise duration on cardiorespiratory fitness following HIIT and MICT. Sports Med, 2026. doi:10.1007/s40279-026-02528-y
- 20Ormond C. Strides: why and how runners should do them. Canadian Running, 2025. runningmagazine.ca
- 21Schoenmakers P, Murray K, White J, Matta G, Bossi AH. Time spent at or near V̇O₂max during high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, 2026. doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01766-x
- 22Gastin PB, Suppiah HT. Anaerobic and aerobic energy system contribution during maximal exercise: a systematic review. Sports Med, 2026. doi:10.1007/s40279-026-02414-7
- 23Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2007. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180304570
Further listening
David and Megan Roche, Some Work, All Play, especially episodes 329 and 327.
David Roche on power and speed, on the Strength Running podcast.
This article is general information, not medical advice. Check with a doctor before starting hard training if you have a health condition or are coming back from an injury. Strides isn’t affiliated with David Roche or Some Work, All Play.